So, say, an M1 mini will blow an Intel mini out of the water.īut what about an M1 versus, say, my current machine, a 16" MacBook Pro?įrom what I've read and seen, an M1 mini, a machine costing about a third of what my mac cost, would be slower in some but faster in other cases. Now, of course we are talking about the "low end". Motion 5.6 and Compressor 4.6 are also available today as free updates for existing users, and for 49.99 (US) each for new users on the Mac App Store.
Final cut pro for mac big sur update#
When you put native or universal applications, there is no contest. Final Cut Pro 10.6 is available today as a free update for existing users, and for 299.99 (US) for new users on the Mac App Store. An M1 mac running an Intel application is, for the most part, as fast or faster than an Intel mac of similar configuration. That concurs with what I have read multiple times. I did not, alas, have the time to do a good test, but it seemed faster than the Intel mac, even though it was not running a native application. Then I quit the application and started it again, and it was pretty quick to launch, and worked buttery smooth. I started it, and it took a while (presumably that was Rosetta 2 doing what it does). They had Final Cut Pro 10.4.10 on it, so it was NOT a "universal" application - it was all Intel. Still, I was impressed, as most applications launched basically instantly. My only direct experience with an M1 mac was at a large store, where they had one MacBook Pro on display, side by side with an Intel one. First, full disclosure: I don't own a mac with M1 (yet).Īll I know is from reading stuff that people have published online.
0 kommentar(er)
